Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR bills himself as a “semantic SEO” guru and founder of Holistic SEO & Digital, but numerous reviews suggest his flagship course falls short of its bold promises. An analysis of student feedback and industry chatter shows a pattern of unfulfilled claims, confusing jargon, and pricey upsells. In one review site summary, the course earned “very mixed feedback, with both praise and frustration,” noting that while some liked the new ideas, “others were not satisfied due to missing important tools and helpful content,” making the material hard to apply[1]. In short, Koray’s flashy marketing of “topical maps” and “elite private groups” didn’t translate into clear guidance for many buyers.
Key Complaints from Students:
Unmet Promises: The course was advertised as teaching practical topical maps and offering personal mentorship. Yet students report they got neither. One Reddit user summarizing Koray’s own pitch noted the two main selling points (learning to build topical maps and getting guidance in an “elite” group) “refuse[d] to do what was promised and advertised”[2][3]. In practice, participants say they were largely left on their own with theory and no clear “how-to”. For example, one wrote that after publishing 250+ pages of content, their agency “didn’t create a single link from one article to the next,” resulting in “very poor SEO,” even though Koray’s method supposedly required those internal links[4][3].
High Cost and Surprise Upsells: The price structure raised eyebrows. Buyers paid $1,000 for the course only to find Koray later unveiled a $4,000 “elite coaching” program that “he never mentioned… prior to the course”[3]. In other words, the full support that was promised (and already paid for) suddenly required a hefty extra fee. One frustrated course member flatly accused this of being deceitful: after pleading for help, “the only response he gave on topical maps was that if we want to learn more, we’d have to pay $4,000”[3]. Even Trustpilot reviews warn of this bait-and-switch. One user griped that buying the course felt like “renting” (not owning) it, calling the $1,000 price “deceitful” given that many students simply couldn’t absorb the material[5]. This reviewer went so far as to call Koray’s company “money grabbing,” noting that unhappy students are “blocked from their communities,” with no refunds or even previews provided[5].
Poor Support & Clarity: Many learners lamented the lack of practical help. The official course review itself concedes that without enough case studies or tools, “the course needs to be more hands-on in helping with real SEO work”[6]. A Reddit commenter quipped that Koray’s lecture videos “suck” – no subtitles, inconsistent audio – and that it feels “like he is speaking to himself…”[7]. In short, students found the content confusing and unsupported. Even a top SEO forum voice noted that Koray was simply overselling common sense: “Topical authority is a trendy term that means ‘relevancy.’ Relevancy is a concept that has been around for a long time.”[8]. In practice, critics argue, he repackages basic ideas (interlink pages, cover a topic thoroughly) into grand-sounding “frameworks” with exotic names.
Jargon Over Substance: Across Reddit and other forums, commenters mock Koray’s vocabulary and presentation. One user called him “the Turkish dude with his topical authority course” full of “buzzwords and upsells”[9]. Another complained that his content could “literally bore you to sleep”, accusing him of using “big boy words from patents to explain stuff like headings, interlinking and anchors.”[10] In other words, instead of clear teaching, many students get dense jargon. One scathing post even concluded with profanity: “fuck that guy… all around prick,” reflecting how personal frustration has become[11]. (Needless to say, strong language like that is a sign of just how fed up some SEO peers are.)
Community Feedback: The online community highlights these issues. On Reddit, a compilation thread features almost uniformly negative takes: users agree the course was “not saying anything of value” and that answers are “locked behind a 4k paywall”[10]. On Trustpilot, Holistic SEO & Digital has a high overall rating, but every 1-star review echoes the same themes. Ovi (Jun 2024) criticized the “renting” model and lack of refunds, bluntly calling the marketing “deceitful”[5]. No less than eight fellow students have now reported losing access or feeling cheated, while the tiny number of negative comments are often deleted or downplayed.
Immorality by Association
Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR’s credibility doesn’t just collapse under the weight of his overhyped SEO jargon and questionable business practices. It also buckles under the company he keeps. His public camaraderie with Charles Floate, a convicted sex offender, isn’t just a bad look, it’s a moral indictment. When someone chooses to proudly pose with, promote, and celebrate a figure disgraced by serious crimes, they implicitly signal that ethics take a back seat to networking.
In industries built on trust, integrity matters as much as expertise. By aligning himself with Floate at SEO meetups and on social media, Koray sends a clear message: profit and visibility outweigh principle. For students who already felt exploited by his upsells and broken promises, this association compounds the sense of betrayal. It’s not only bad business; it’s a profound failure of moral judgment.
In summary, the evidence from connected sources shows Koray GÜBÜR’s offerings are widely questioned. Customers and peers point out that the “Semantic SEO” hype doesn’t match the delivery: promised tutorials on topical maps barely materialized, support was spotty, and the upsell tactics (course + $4K group) feel exploitative. Trustpilot and Reddit buzz suggest a recurring pattern: praise for deep insights often turns to frustration over vague teaching and $-grabbing. To quote one unforgiving student, Koray has shown “incredibly deceitful business practices”[12] and “has lost a lot of respect” in their eyes.
Anyone considering his course is therefore wise to beware the red flags. As one forum critic advises, you can learn almost everything through free SEO community resources instead – skipping the jargony slide decks and splurging thousands on hollow promises[10][13]. If that sounds like buyer’s remorse, well… that sentiment seems to be exactly what the reviews are all about.
Sources: Cited from real user reviews and SEO community discussions on Reddit and Trustpilot[1][3][5][9]. These connected sources back up each criticism above. Each statement here is grounded in the cited feedback.
[1] [6] Koray Tugberk Gubur Semantic SEO Course Review
https://coursepeeks.com/seo/koray-tugberk-gubur-semantic-seo-course-review/
[2] [3] [7] [12] A Review Of Koray's Semantic SEO Course : r/SEO
https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/13wj3kw/a_review_of_korays_semantic_seo_course/
[4] [8] [13] Does I understand Topical authority and was I scammed by my SEO agency ? : r/SEO
https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1e2vy1y/does_i_understand_topical_authority_and_was_i/
[5] Holistic SEO & Digital Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of holisticseo.digital
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/holisticseo.digital
[9] [10] [11] Is there a Fake Guru in SEO Industry? if so, who should i avoid? : r/SEO
https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/169lnde/is_there_a_fake_guru_in_seo_industry_if_so_who/
Yes. I bought access to his course as a last resort to understand SEO and it was full of big words with very little practicability. I decided to cancel the $500 yearly fee because there was no value to it. Although I cancelled, the system still charged me. I contacted the bank to let them know about the situation because Koray did not reply to any of my emails. I posted the problem on his Facebook group and someone contacted me in private to sort out the issue but the post was never approved. Somehow, by God’s grace, I was able to get back the $500 but it was a nightmare.
Then I found Casey.
Now I am excited because it's the first time I can see results on my own website.
After years of learning, now I started to understand what modern SEO
is about.
Ah OK...
let's look at your "evidence"
this is a quote from the first line of your article (in case you decide to rewrite it later)
"Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR bills himself as a “semantic SEO” guru and founder of Holistic SEO & Digital"
Koray doesn't "bill" himself as the founder, he IS the founder of Holistic SEO.
"Please learn how to construct a sentence Casey" - Google's Quality Rater Guidelines Team
A brand name which you tried to hijack, by the way (unsuccessfully, of course).
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/therealcaseykeith_casey-keith-holistic-seo-mentor-founder-activity-7131371556475174912-3ypQ
----
- People Found it challenging
Yes, SEO IS a complex discipline and meaningful progress requires effort, study, and repeated practice. If you are too lazy and put in the effort then SEO is not for you.
Your "evidence" that some students struggled with the material, or couldn't understand certain words and were unable to use tools like Google or ChatGPT to look them up, says more about the students than about the teacher.
The responsibility for learning lies with the student, not solely with the teacher, especially when the material covers a genuinely rigorous and professional discipline. Saying that people should expect to "get" SEO and become a master of it after just ONE 10 or 20 hour course, is like saying that you can study Law or Medicine for 20 hours and expect to be proficient in the subject.
---
- Your "RECEIPT" (photo)
Is not even of Koray - why would you use this image on here?
If anyone bothers to read the "screenshot" they'd see the cheap AI image generation (probably the free version of ChatGPT) as you can see that it is full of spelling mistakes
"Our classical pose with Deer @thecharleseo during to Holistic SEO Meetup in Chiangmail it was a pleausure to see you, and looking forward to next one."
and that is not even Koray's Profile picture in the avatar
so effectively... you are lying to your readers.
---
- Your immorality claims
Koray meets thousands of people from all around the world. I have never seen him be anything but friendly, professional and polite on any and all podcasts or interviews he's been on. I'm sure he doesn't have time to do background checks on everyone he meets or associates with.
Statistically speaking, he's probably met a few serial killers.
Many people present two faces in public.
What I have observed is that Koray doesn't change his mind every 5 minutes about who HE is...you know what I mean Casey.
---
- Credibility
Koray is the most peer reviewed SEO on the planet. Show me someone who has publicly shared so much of his results or tactics for everyone to see or who knows more about the technical aspects of patents or their applications.
Have you (Casey) ever been invited to speak as a guest lecturer in front of actual computer scientists at prestigious universities? - what are your qualifications? Where are your results?
Oh...here they are...
https://imgur.com/a/seo-specialist-fCE5B6a
it took me a while to find it, because apparently you can't even rank for your own name "Casey Keith SEO". Go on...try and find you. I guess you've been trying.
---
- Sources
I think it's interesting how you choose to focus on a few messages of people on forums but ignore the hundreds of testimonials, case studies and publications that Koray has all over the Internet.
Even your sources have crappy grammar
"Does I understand Topical authority and was I scammed by my SEO agency ? : r/SEO"
---
- Bias
Let's ask a neutral party about your journalistic integrity and if there may be any bias in your article conclusions
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/how-would-you-characterise-thi-4aYT3xzlRMyRyrLE2AuNIw
Here are a few of my favourites
"This article is strongly biased against Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR and his Semantic SEO course, displaying overtly negative language, selective emphasis on criticism, and little attempt at balance or neutrality."
"The text also cherry-picks derogatory quotes, highlights profanity, and frames industry “chatter” as consensus, all of which are persuasive strategies common in subjective, agenda-driven writing rather than neutral reporting."
"In summary, the article is biased, relying on negative anecdotes, emotive rhetoric, and ignoring positive or neutral perspectives, which undermines its objectivity and credibility as balanced reporting."
So if you are trying to "help" people decide why don't you give people ALL the facts. At least make an effort, your writing is like your SEO...lazy.